Dustland
Registered user
Registered: 09-2012
Posts: 244
Karma: 3 (+3/-0)
|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: [OOC] [Supers!] The Age of Aquarius
I've never used Invisible Castle, so let's see what this does:
Initiative
11
|
|
5/27/2013, 3:51 pm
|
Link to this post
Email Dustland
PM Dustland
Blog
|
ruckusmanager
Registered user
Registered: 09-2012
Posts: 156
Karma: 1 (+1/-0)
|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: [OOC] [Supers!] The Age of Aquarius
Pecks is going to try and resist the dark tendrils by just muscling past them.
He gets a 15 on a roll here. He easily muscles past them.
He then does a Fighting attack on Stuart, rolling 12 here. (He can only count the top 3 dice because it's an aptitude.)
Of course his gang then piles on, for a 5 attack!
Stuart needs a couple of defense rolls.
|
|
5/27/2013, 4:24 pm
|
Link to this post
Email ruckusmanager
PM ruckusmanager
Blog
|
ruckusmanager
Registered user
Registered: 09-2012
Posts: 156
Karma: 1 (+1/-0)
|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: [OOC] [Supers!] The Age of Aquarius
Once urbwar rolls for Stuart's defenses, everyone should roll for new initiative.
Here is Pecks roll: 11!!!
The gang is still at 5.
|
|
5/27/2013, 5:14 pm
|
Link to this post
Email ruckusmanager
PM ruckusmanager
Blog
|
ruckusmanager
Registered user
Registered: 09-2012
Posts: 156
Karma: 1 (+1/-0)
|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: [OOC] [Supers!] The Age of Aquarius
Hey, I just had to look up if black holes were even known back in the '60s (they were).
|
|
5/27/2013, 5:20 pm
|
Link to this post
Email ruckusmanager
PM ruckusmanager
Blog
|
Dustland
Registered user
Registered: 09-2012
Posts: 244
Karma: 3 (+3/-0)
|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: [OOC] [Supers!] The Age of Aquarius
Agent K's Initiative:
http://invisiblecastle.com/roller/view/4065030/
8
Oops, roll is an 8.
Last edited by Dustland, 5/27/2013, 5:33 pm
|
|
5/27/2013, 5:31 pm
|
Link to this post
Email Dustland
PM Dustland
Blog
|
ruckusmanager
Registered user
Registered: 09-2012
Posts: 156
Karma: 1 (+1/-0)
|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: [OOC] [Supers!] The Age of Aquarius
Sorry, I just remembered the technical term in Supers! is Reaction.
|
|
5/27/2013, 6:05 pm
|
Link to this post
Email ruckusmanager
PM ruckusmanager
Blog
|
Harrigan
Registered user
Registered: 05-2013
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 72
Karma: 0 (+0/-0)
|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: [OOC] [Supers!] The Age of Aquarius
Traveling today so this is likely my last post until tonight...
Grace's next Reaction: 4
Does she also need to do something to resist the black hole, or should I just write her being pulled on into her next IC post?
|
|
5/27/2013, 6:27 pm
|
Link to this post
Email Harrigan
PM Harrigan
Blog
|
ruckusmanager
Registered user
Registered: 09-2012
Posts: 156
Karma: 1 (+1/-0)
|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: [OOC] [Supers!] The Age of Aquarius
I'm interpreting being pulled into the "black hole" (which is really just Agent K remember) as the effect of his main attack. Resisting it is just making a defense roll (or should I say defence in honor of the original text ).
|
|
5/27/2013, 7:38 pm
|
Link to this post
Email ruckusmanager
PM ruckusmanager
Blog
|
ruckusmanager
Registered user
Registered: 09-2012
Posts: 156
Karma: 1 (+1/-0)
|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: [OOC] [Supers!] The Age of Aquarius
Here's our current order of actions:
Pecks (11)
Agent K (8)
Thugs (5)
Grace (4)
Still waiting for Stuart, who also first needs to make 2 defense rolls.
In rereading the rules, I don't think we need to make reaction rolls every round, and that might be the easiest in a pbp setting (although I definitely do it face to face, to represent the diminishing returns as you take damage if nothing else). let me know what everyone thinks (I'm assuming a couple of people here are much more familiar with the rules than I).
|
|
5/27/2013, 7:44 pm
|
Link to this post
Email ruckusmanager
PM ruckusmanager
Blog
|
Dustland
Registered user
Registered: 09-2012
Posts: 244
Karma: 3 (+3/-0)
|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: [OOC] [Supers!] The Age of Aquarius
I'm fine with keeping the same order of actions each round if nothing else than to keep things moving smoothly.
|
|
5/27/2013, 8:09 pm
|
Link to this post
Email Dustland
PM Dustland
Blog
|
