You're welcome.
Zenith Comics: http:/ ... For the latest mayhem go to Musings and mayhem from Andrew Collas       Sign up (learn about it) | Sign in (lost password?)

Page:  1  2 

novaexpress Profile
Live feed
Miscellaneous info

Registered user

Registered: 09-2012
Posts: 35
Karma: 0 (+0/-0)
Reply | Quote
Re: Revised Supers! - Rules Thread (Not Including Combat)


It's surely coming a day after the fair, but I designed a vehicule once using:


Manoeuvrability: (the score adds up to the driver's Vehicules Aptitude). I prefer that than Reaction for a vehicule. And I like to use the Vehicules Aptitude instead of the character's Reaction because Reaction is already very used and so useful in the game (dodging, initiative, dexterity in general). I don't want to unbalance it more.

Armor (and Tough Defence) if needed

Super Speed

About Size, I don't know if it's useful to create it just to determine the passengers capacity ; or if it's sufficient just to precise it in the vehicle's description.
I mean, compared to Fortitude, Armor or Super Speed, Size only serves to describe the number of seats or the cargo capacity.

Besides, I like the idea of mounted weapons using split attack, area effect or armor piercing as suggested earlier.

Sorry for my English, but i's not my primary language.
3/16/2013, 6:54 am Link to this post Email novaexpress   PM novaexpress Blog

Add a reply

Page:  1  2 

You are not logged in (login)